For
Immediate Release:
Monday, January 24, 2005
News Radio Los Angeles: No Passion
Bridge Ratings has combined
traditional audience measurement with behavior analysis resulting
in far more effective radio consumer research on the various
conditions of the radio industry and its audiences.
While we have been measuring audience attrition
around commercial breaks and erosion of our audiences to digital
media, Bridge Ratings has been conducting its usual measurement
in Los Angeles. Several different types of studies are on-going,
one of which is yielding some fascinating answers to the continuing
mystery of newsradio and why in a major markets, specifically
Los Angeles, can two major all-news stations not capture more
than a 3.0 to 3.5 12+ Arbitron share.
The answers coming out of a year-long study are
multi-layered and at the heart of the problem, that is, in and
of itself, a major explanation. By the way, some of the issues
we uncovered in Los Angeles news radio listener behavior are
now beginning to be expressed in other major markets where news
radio competes with re-tooled Talk radio stations.
Here are some initial behavioral reasons why news
radio in Los Angeles can't move the needle to increase Arbitron
average quarter hour:
1. Bridge Ratings has no confidence in average-quarter-hour
measurement nor its cousin time-spent-listening. The convoluted
calculation required to generate such numbers raises the margin
of error for such estimates beyond reliability. At Bridge Ratings
more confident estimates rest with CUME and FAVORITENESS. Favoriteness
simply seeks listenering behavior related to the station audiences
listen to most often. Years of studies tell us that a listener
devotes between 66 and 80 percent of their weekly listening to
their favorite station. This statistic represents loyalty and
when combined with cume reflects a station's ability to convert
its cume to favoritness. News radio/LA problem number
1: no loyalty.
Favoriteness shares in an of themselves do not
typically predict Arbitron's AQH but favoriteness trends do predict
Arbitron AQH and TSL; favoriteness is simply a more reliable
number. Since the departure of George Nicholaw and the arrival
of programmer David G. Hall, loyalty to LA's two news stations
has actually diminished. What has improved, is the stations'
ability to attract new cume.
2. Reasons for non-loyalty. Whatever
loyalty News radio/LA enjoys is coming from their older demographics.
Bridge Ratings' studies show that there is no motivation for
young listeners to spend much time with either KNX or KFWB because
they are getting their news fix elsewhere. On the radio dial
in LA, when 18-24 year olds listen, they get their news served
up in ways more palatable for their lifestyles: KROQ, Indie 103,
KLSX and KPWR are the only radio stations mentioned when this
demographic is asked about their radio news sources.
Not an AM station on the list.
What is more interesting is that the behavior of
this demographic underscores the general lack of real interest
by this lifegroup in what's going on in the world and in their
city. When they are seeking this information, they are likely
getting more of it from other electronic sources such as the
Internet, MTV and word of mouth from friends and parents. There
tends to be not one dependable source for this group. As is the
case with music radio for this generation, there is so little
being offered on traditional radio that appeals to them or is
presented properly, that they seek and find it with other media.
Thus, traditional AM news radio is not attracting
any new cume on the younger end. The on-air approach just doesn't
interest them
Other reasons for non-loyalty to news radio include
improved news presentation on other AM stations such as KFI,
KABC, KLAX and KLVE and on the lifestyle approach taken by the
FM stations previously mentioned.
The broadness of the all news approach cannot sustain
loyalty under fire from specialists. The AM all-news stations
have lost significant news image to their AM news/talk
brothers. KFI and KABC especially, have retooled their news approach
to satisfy the lifestyles of the available audience.
KNX and KFWB simply have not kept up with the times in significant
areas such as story selection, writing, presentation and relevance.
Listeners we have interviewed cite consistently these four areas
where they are getting a more fulfilling newscast on other radio
outlets than on the traditional news stations.
When asked "When you want to know about world
and local news information, where do you go?" the following
chart shows:
News Sources
| |
Trad Radio |
Internet |
TV |
Print |
| 12-17 |
16% |
36% |
47% |
1% |
| 18-24 |
22% |
34% |
35% |
9% |
| 25-49 |
23% |
29% |
24% |
24% |
| 35-64 |
25% |
21% |
29% |
25% |
| 65+ |
27% |
14% |
38% |
21% |
Traditional radio continues to face the challenge
of retooling its product for the under 35's.
Following is a chart derived from Bridge Ratings'
audience measurement in Los Angeles. Chart reflects of all stations/formats
listeners consider for 'favoriteness", where does news radio
stand?
Favorite Radio Station: News
| |
Nov 2004 |
Nov 2003 |
| 12-17 |
0% |
0% |
| 18-24 |
1.4% |
3.6% |
| 25-49 |
5.9% |
7.1% |
| 35-64 |
9.7% |
10.9% |
| 65+ |
24% |
23.1% |
How to read: Listener favoriteness for news-specific
radio stations across all demographics with the exception of
65+ has declined since March 2004.
While favoriteness diminishes, news radio’s ability to
attract more individual listeners is improving over the nine
months’ studied. The improvement is fueled by all demographics
18+ but is primarily impacted by a significant “Tune-in
model” for adults 40+:
Daily Tune In Frequency:
News |
|
Nov 2004 |
Nov 2003 |
12-17 |
2 |
0 |
18-24 |
4 |
1 |
25-49 |
5 |
3 |
35-64 |
8 |
6 |
65+ |
10+ |
9 |
An interesting note: daily (cume) tune in to news radio has
increased more significantly under 35’s vs. 35+. The reason
may lie with the potential for growth among young listeners.
With 35+ cume and tune in a relatively healthy state, and with
the “quick fix” behavior of tune in by the under
35 year olds, news radio has potential to grab and hold these
listeners for increased loyalty, favoriteness and cume to favoriteness
conversion. The solution, we believe, rests with a more defined
understanding of the lifestyles of the news radio audience.
For additional information, contact Dave Van Dyke
at 818.291.6420.
Results reflect listener behavior between March and November
2004.
|