For
Immediate Release:
Monday, January 3, 2005
There is no "Average" Radio
Listener
During the twelve months ending December 15, 2004,
Bridge Ratings has been conducting an eye-opening series of studies
related to iPod/MP3 player libraries.
Study goal: To learn about radio
listener music preferences.
Methodology:
Two groups of music consumers were tracked.
A) Listeners whose listening to traditional radio
has decreased at least fifteen percent in the previous
9 months.
B) Listeners whose listening to traditional radio
has maintained increased or decreased less than ten percent in
the previous 9 months.
Each group was divided into music constituencies, i.e.,
participants were placed into groups representing their primary
radio listening. For example, individuals whose favorite station
was Country, were placed into a Country constituency. These groupings
allowed us to study music purity when studying the music
file selections on their digital players. (see charts below)
1200 persons 12+ in each of the above categories
were tracked weekly over a period of three months. During this
time, each participant was willing to share the contents of his/her
digital music player.
Findings of Interest:
- On average 60% of participants made some change in the
files on their digital music players each week (adding, deleting
or both).
- 14% changed files more frequently than once a week.
- 5% changed files daily
- 17% made some changes every two weeks
- 4% made no change to their files
- 88% of the participants included more than one music "category" on
their digital music players, i.e. almost all participants
in the study have a variety of musical tastes.
This last point raises a very interesting and important
point: today's radio listeners prefer diversity in their
music entertainment. Both groups' radio listening experience
suggests that their lower time-spent-listening is a function
of a desire to hear more musical diversity and thus spend time
with more stations each week than previously thought.
This higher desire for more variety of music radio
station choice each week is the motivator for listeners to seek additional music
diversity by managing their personal music choices through MP3
players.
The study found that a significant portion
of traditional radio's listener base is driven to alternative
digital entertainment choices by lack of musical diversity
on traditional radio.
The diversity of the music on the digital players
of each format constituency group was then plotted to give us
a sense of commonality - if there was any - among the
types of variety sought by each musical constituency. What we
found was that, yes, most constituencies tend to prefer at least
one music type in addition to the one which defines their favorite
station music preference.
The Adult Contemporary Listener
Music Type Compatibility - AC
Favorite: AC |
Compatibility (%) |
Incidence Rate |
Oldies |
98.7 |
8.0 |
AC |
87.2 |
9.6 |
Urban AC |
79.3 |
7.1 |
Smooth Jazz |
64.1 |
7.5 |
CHR |
55.7 |
7.9 |
Pop/Country |
49.8 |
6.1 |
Rock |
22.1 |
4.0 |
Interpretation
Digital player content was measured by:
a) Incidence rate - The potential of this music
type to have a place on digital music players of listeners who
consider an Adult Contemporary radio station to be their favorite,
the one they listen to most. On a scale of 1 to 10. The closer
to 10 the higher the chance this type of music appears on their
digital player.
b) Compatibility - As reported by the sample, the perceived preference
of music type. On a scale of 1 to 100 percent.
How to read: Of those listeners who consider
Adult Contemporary radio as their favorite, the Oldies music
type has a 98.7 percent compatibility with their music tastes,
i.e. this music type was rated highest by 98.7 percent of the
sample, while Adult Contemporary music was the music type with
the most songs, as a percentage, on the overall sample's list
of songs on their digital music players.
Music Compatibility - Country
| Favorite: Country |
Compatibility % |
Incidence Rate |
Country |
97.2 |
9.7 |
Oldies |
89.8 |
8.1 |
AC |
85.5 |
9.1 |
CHR |
59.2 |
6.1 |
Smooth Jazz |
51.3 |
5.3 |
Urban AC |
46.6 |
5.6 |
Alternative |
44.9 |
4.4 |
Rock |
39.2 |
3.9 |
Music Compatibility - Rock
| Favorite: Rock |
Compatibility % |
Incidence Rate |
Rock |
98.4 |
9.5 |
Alternative |
85.5 |
8.8 |
Oldies |
84.2 |
9.1 |
Country |
81.1 |
7.2 |
Urban/Rap |
68.3 |
6.9 |
Smooth Jazz |
55.2 |
6.7 |
CHR |
47.7 |
5.1 |
AC |
40.4 |
6.0 |
These examples represent just three of the format
types measured in this project. What is clear is that radio listeners
who report preferences for radio stations with specific/narrow
music formats have broader musical tastes than previously
quantified. Over 85% of those interviewed for this project told
us that the digital player offered them custom entertainment diversity in
one compact solution and this was the number one reason they
were spending more time with their digital players and less with
traditional radio.
Implications for the Radio Programmer
Radio programmers, regardless of format, armed
with this research will be able to determine new ways to expose
their core library as well as what type of complementary music
types to include in the mix. The mix is determined by the what
the grids indicate are acceptable levels of tolerance for the
core listener.
For example, among Country listeners, our research
shows a permissible tolerance for Oldies and AC music. The selection
of the proper titles from these music types is the secret sauce
here. Not all Oldies or AC titles will work in the Country music
environment, but our studies show that there is an acceptance
and interest for more of this type of music in the Country
radio music mix. The same is true for other music formats we
have studied.
Inevitably, we are learning that within reason programmers
should be more broad with their playlists than more narrow. This
paradigm shift in radio programming will require an intelligent
use of a diversity of titles from the "palette" of
acceptable music types for specific music formats.
For additional information or advisement, contact
Dave Van Dyke at 818.291.6420.
Markets measured: Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Lafayette,
LA, Toronto, Cleveland
|